Veterans Administration requests retraction of 80 ‘medical events’

1
792

By Walter F. Roche Jr. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Veterans Affairs officials are asking the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to retract the VA’s reporting of 80 “medical events” stemming from six years of treating veterans with improper radiation doses.

If approved by the NRC, the unprecedented request would eliminate the negative “medical event” categorization for 80 of 97 previously reported cases in which prostate cancer patients were given improper doses of radiation at the VA’s Philadelphia facility. NRC officials say they do not recall ever getting a similar request.

Records released by the VA indicate that at least one of the 80 patients was from the Pittsburgh area.

According to the NRC Web site, a “medical event” indicates potential problems in a medical facility’s use of radioactive materials. It does not necessarily result in harm to the patient.

In a 17-page submission made public Saturday, Gary E. Williams, head of the VA’s radiation programs, said existing standards for determining a “medical event” are “both imprecise and too subjective for regulatory review” by the NRC or regulated entities.

He wrote that if the Philadelphia cases were reviewed under the standards recommended by a recently convened “blue ribbon panel” of experts, only 17 of the 97 incidents would be classified as “medical events.” The proposed standards would focus on the accuracy of the placement of radioactive seeds rather than on the accuracy of achieving the planned dosage.

The NRC has taken the request under advisement.

Read more at Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
Previous articleCheney Exposes Torture Conspiracy
Next articleRegional Veterans’ News 2/15/10