…by Jonas E. Alexis
NWO agents and Satan worshipers really make Putin’s job too easy these days. Surely Putin is having fun with these guys because he always uses his intellectual and moral clarity to literally humiliate them and make their arguments look silly and worthless.
What is even more interesting is that Putin sometimes laugh at how they usually set a trap for him to catch him, thinking that he would fall for it. Then he would move on to destroy their premises and literally slash their defenses, like a lion ambushing and then devouring a poor zebra.
Moreover, an interview with Putin is really dangerous because if you are an NWO agent and Satan worshiper, you will almost certainly be ripped open and cut down. Remember what happened to Charlie Rose?
It has become so easy for Putin that Benny Avni of the New York Post has finally conceded defeat. Obama, Avni says, failed miserably at the UN conference.[1]
In a similar vein, Leonid Bershidsky of Bloomberg admits that “Obama’s 42-minute speech was heavy on emotion and rhetoric. Putin’s 23-minute one was bleak and to the point.”[2] Simon Jenkins of the Guardian has concurred, “Putin has already performed the two primary duties of a Russian leader, bringing stability and pride.”[3]
Avni declared elsewhere that “Russia’s might is beating America’s right.”[4] Similarly, Daniel W. Drezner, Jewish professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, said:
“The only accomplishments of the Obama administration’s Syria policy are that (a) Syria gave up some chemical weapons and (b) U.S. ground troops are not in Syria. Besides that, it’s been an unmitigated disaster on every dimension…
“Russian President Vladimir Putin excels at flummoxing President Obama… So, yes, the administration gets an ‘F’ for its handling of Syria and a ‘D’ for its handling of Vladimir Putin.”[5]
Flaming Jewish Neocon Max Boot has lamented that the U.S. “is being humiliated.”[6] Who’s doing that job? Max Boot said that it is Iran, Russia, and Syria, “a new Axis of Evil.”[7]
As far as those three countries being “a new Axis of Evil,” Boot is certainly dreaming here. Even Drezner agrees: “When I start seeing stories describing a new axis of evil threatening the United States, well, it’s physically impossible for me not to roll my eyes.”[8]
Drezner seems to agree with Putin when Drezner looks at what happened in Iraq in the last decade: “As the Wall Street Journal’s Gerald Seib notes, ‘Certainly more than a decade’s worth of involvement on the ground next door in Iraq hasn’t produced a happy outcome, and at the cost of thousands of American lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.’”[9]
CBS News tells us that because of the UN conference, the U.S. has suspended its program to train the Syrian rebels/terrorists.[10] (I’m very skeptical of this claim.)
The big question here is this: Are NWO agents and Satan worshipers like Boot being humiliated by Russia, Iran, and Syria?
Certainly. Boot cited the Daily Telegraph saying,
“President Bashar al-Assad’s key backers declared victory on Sunday night after Western leaders who had previously backed Syrian rebels, including David Cameron, said they accepted he would stay in power, at least for the time being.”[11]
That is indeed a victory. But how did NWO agents received such a defeat? Well, people are getting tired of their nonsense. Just take a look at Marc Rubio’s pathetic performance and Zionist whore Pamela Geller’s recent political gyration. Geller has declared that
“Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday admonished those who supported democratic revolutions in the Middle East, telling the United Nations they led to the rise of a globally ambitious Islamic State.”
Democratic revolutions? When was the last time that NWO agents and Satan worshipers created democratic revolutions in the Middle East? In 2003? 2011? Can the Zionist whore help us here?
Rubio, a U.S. presidential candidate, made the statement that Putin is “a gangster” and a former KGB agent. Therefore he ought not to be trusted. Sean R. Liedman of the National Interest also summons this KGB thing to make a point.[12] Rubio, who usually struggles to get a rational thought in head when it comes to foreign policy, said:
“Russia is governed today by a gangster. He’s basically an organized crime figure who controls the government and a large territory. There’s no other way to describe Vladimir Putin.”
Putin did not take too much time to respond to such nonsense. In the words of Leon Hadar, Rubio and other are certainly “parrots on speed.”[13] Putin said:
“How can I be a gangster if I worked for the KGB? Come on, that does not correspond to reality.”
Charlie Rose, during his interview with Putin, cut to the chase and also declared that Putin is a former KGB agent, leaving audiences everywhere with the impression that Putin still carries this KGB ideology in his pockets. He moved on to make this ridiculous claim:
“Somebody in Russia told me that there is no such thing as a former KGB man. Once a KGB man, always a KGB man.”
This is absolutely terrible. Don’t Rose and other NWO agents think before they make these perverse and filthy claims? Don’t they know that this very simple assertion can be detrimental to the whole Neoconservative/Neo-Bolshevik/Zionist ideology?
Consider this. Neoconservative luminary Francis Fukuyama of Stanford (formerly of Johns Hopkins) compares the neoconservative movement to Leninism. Neoconservatism, according to Fukuyama, is the reincarnation to some extent of both Leninism and Bolshevism.[14]
Even Irving Kristol himself proudly admitted that the “honor I most prized was the fact that I was a member in good standing of the [Trotskyist] Young People’s Socialist League (Fourth International).”[15] Kristol was not just a former Trotskyist, but a former neo-Marxist, neo-socialist, and neo-liberal.[16]
And this Neoconservative movement, as Jewish writer Sidney Blumenthal has shown, found its political and intellectual ideology “in the disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”[17] Even after the birth of the neoconservative movement, many of its members such as Stephen Schwartz of the Weekly Standard and Joan Wohlstetter of the RAND Corporation still had a burning thirst for Lev Davidovich Bronstein, known as Leon Trotsky.[18]
As we have seen over and over, this Neoconservative movement gave us the war in Iraq, which was based on obvious lies and fabrications. When Paul Wolfowitz was told by deputy national security advisor Stephen Hadley that there was no link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, Wolfowitz responded with certainty, “We’ll find it. It’s got to be there,”[19] which is another way of saying that if it does not exist, they would make it up.
This war eventually gave America a six trillion-dollar debt.[20] This war and others made former soldiers disillusioned as well.[21] Then after the war, people were being held at Guantanamo with no evidence that they were terrorists. In the process, U.S. officials deliberately ignored the rules of law and proceeded to illegally keep individuals behind bars in the new gulag. People from different parts of the world were kept illegally for seven years, only to find out that they were not terrorists and had to be set free.[22]
What was so sickening about this issue was that in spite of evidence of wrongdoing, some Neoconservatives blamed the 2008 economic crash on terrorists and parties outside the United States!
Kevin D. Freeman, the author of “Economic Warfare: Risks and Responses,” declares that “a three-phased attack was planned and is in the process against the United States economy.”[23] Bill Gertz of the Washington Times reports,
“While economic analysts and a final report from the federal government’s Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission blame the crash on such economic factors as high-risk mortgage lending practices and poor federal regulation and supervision, the Pentagon contractor adds a new element: ‘outside forces,’ a factor the commission did not examine.”[24]
These “outside forces” include Islamic terrorists, the Chinese military, Russia, Venezuela, and Iran. Where is the evidence for these spurious notions? Freeman provides none, but admits that this is only hypothetical. Paul Bracken of Yale declares that there is “no convincing evidence that ‘outside forces’ colluded to bring about the 2008 crisis.”[25]
The simple question are this: will Charlie Rose and Marc Rubio have the courage to tell Bill Kristol, who is on Fox News all the time and who once bragged that Obama was “a born-again Neocon,” that his father was a Trotskyite? Will they have the intellectual honesty to tell Kristol that the Neoconservative movement is largely responsible for the mess in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, etc.?
If they cannot do that, then you can be sure that they have been paid to dance around like puppets. They are NWO agents and whores who will do just about anything to get a piece of dollar, a few minutes of fame and a little bit of power. This is why they always get mad or sad when Putin makes a move in the Middle East. This is why they are always eager to attack Putin.
Jewish Gideon Resnick of the Daily Beast for example is already upset that Russia Today is cheering for Putin’s move in Syria.[26] Again, David Axe of the Daily Beast has declared that “Putin’s jets in Syria are a threat to the U.S.”[27]
The New York Times declares that Putin is very aggressive when it comes to Syria[28] (but the U.S. is not when it comes to Iraq and Afghanistan). Some writers in the New York Times seem to be upset because Russia attacked a group (Syrian rebels/terrorists, of course) that was trained by the C.I.A.[29] Jewish writer Masha Gessen perversely declared in the New York Times:
“The biggest and most dangerous enemy in Mr. Putin’s world is the United States. So sinister is this enemy that its name cannot be uttered: His speech criticized U.S. behavior without naming the country, referring to the Americans as ‘those who created the situation’ in Syria, and as outsiders who provoked an armed coup in Ukraine.”[30]
That perverse assertion looks good on paper. In fact, there is no doubt that thousands upon thousands of naïve and ignorant people will buy. But let us hear Putin himself:
As we have said over and over, Putin agrees that the New World Order worships Satan and that there is indeed a wicked ideology that is at the center stage of U.S. foreign policy, but that does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that Putin hates decent people in the U.S.
Furthermore, if Putin hates the United States that much, why would he ask the U.S. to share information on ISIS?[31] You see, NWO agents and Satan worshipers like Gessen can never stop lying because that is how their ideology can thrive. NWO agents like Gessen are just scared to death because Putin has actually shown the world that Satan worshipers simply have no clothes.
If the “collapse of Iraq and the rise of ISIS” were manufactured in the United States,[32] then Putin has every reason to attack those who were the culprits. NWO agents are trembling because their Mephistophelian ideology is being challenged. And Putin is no joke. “Moscow says hello to ISIL with a new type of weapon we have not seen before, in the first strike.” As Luciana Bohne of Edinboro University has adequately put it,
“Understandably, the US rabid dogs of war are straining at the chain to which international law constrains them. How dare Russia oppose US plans for regime change in Syria and impede a further blood bath to achieve it?”[33]
Our friend and colleague here at VT Preston James answers why:
“Certainly President Putin’s willingness to call a spade a spade by attributing Satanism as the driving force behind the Western NWO Axis of Evil (the UK, Israel and America), is completely justified and marks a major turning point in World History.
“Stay tuned and watch the pernicious RKM Tribalists completely dis-empowered in the weeks and months ahead. Judgment is now on the way to the RKM and its Cutouts because the whole World is now turning against them.
“And no one deserve judgment more than the incredibly evil, parasitical, anti-human RKM and its Cutouts. They have been working hard to produce Hell on Earth and now it’s their turn to reap the judgment for it. See if Lucifer can save them from this coming judgment!”
[1] Benny Avni, “Obama has turned Putin into the world’s most powerful leader,” NY Post, September 29, 2015.
[2] Leonid Bershidsky, “Obama and Putin Move Toward Compromise on Syria,” Bloomberg, September 29, 2015 29, 2015.
[3] Simon Jenkins, “Why the west should listen to Putin on Syria,” Guardian, September 29, 2015.
[4] Benny Avni, “Why Russia’s might is beating America’s right,” NY Post, September 15, 2015.
[5] Daniel W. Drezner, “Why I can’t get worked up about Russia in the Middle East,” Washington Post, September 29, 2015.
[6] Max Boot, “The New Axis of Evil,” Commentary, September 28, 2015.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Drezner, “Why I can’t get worked up about Russia in the Middle East,” Washington Post, September 29, 2015.
[9] Ibid.
[10] “U.S. gives up effort to train Syrian opposition forces,” CBS News, September 28, 2015.
[11] Boot, “The New Axis of Evil,” Commentary, September 28, 2015.
[12] Sean R. Liedman, “The Russian Navy Is Back,” National Interest, September 30, 2015.
[13] Leon Hadar, “The Logic of Putin’s Syria Campaign,” American Conservative, September 30, 2015.
[14] Francis Fukuyama, “After Neoconservatism,” NY Times, February 19, 2006
[15] Stephen Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 43.
[16] Meir Soloveichik, “Irving Kristol, Edmund Burke, and the Rabbis,” Jewish Review of Books, Number 6, Summer 2011.
[17] Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter-Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power (New York: HarperCollins, 1998), 124.
[18] Craig Unger, The Fall of the House of Bush (New York: Scribner, 2007), 40-43.
[19] Thomas E. Ricks, “Fear Factor,” NY Times, October 5, 2012.
[20] Ernesto Londono, “Study: Iraq, Afghan war costs to top $4 trillion,” Washington Post, March 28, 2013; Bob Dreyfuss, “The $6 Trillion Wars,” The Nation, March 29, 2013; “Iraq War Cost U.S. More Than $2 Trillion, Could Grow to $6 Trillion, Says Watson Institute Study,” Huffington Post, May 14, 2013.
[21] Benjamin Percy, “On the Ground,” NY Times, October 4, 2012
[22] Ricks, “Fear Factor,” NY Times.
[23] Bill Gertz, “Financial Terrorism Suspected in 2008 Economic Crash,” Washington Times, February 28, 2011.
[24] Ibid.
[25] Ibid.
[26] Gideon Resnick, “Putin TV: Russian Airstrikes Are ‘Sacred,’” Daily Beast, September 30, 2015.
[27] David Axe, “Putin’s Jets in Syria Are a Threat to the U.S.,” Daily Beast, September 30, 2015.
[28] “Putin and Obama Have Profound Differences on Syria,” NY Times, September 28, 2015.
[29] Helene Cooper, Michael R. Gordon, and Neil MacFarquhar, “Russians Strike Targets in Syria, but Not ISIS Areas,” NY Times, September 30, 2015.
[30] Masha Gessen, “Vladimir Putin’s Guide to World History,” NY Times, September 30, 2015.
[31] Darya Korsunskaya, “Kremlin: Putin, Obama Discussed Sharing Information on Syria,” Haaretz, September 29, 2015.
[32] Doug Bandow, “The Collapse of Iraq and the Rise of ISIS: Made in America?,” National Interest, September 23, 2015.
[33] Luciana Bohne, “License to Kill,” Counter Punch, September 24, 2015.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
