VetLikeMe Weekly 1/30/2015

0
1515

Brief History of Fraud and Abuse in the  SDVOSB Set-aside program

 

By Hardy Stonehardy-stone111

Comments in bold italic and parentheses may not reflect the opinions of VetLikeMe contributors. My comments are NOT the actual language from the official GAO report.

Fraud has always existed in set-aside programs. This review of fraud and abuse begins when VetLikeMe started publishing; it existed in the program long before we opened our doors.

In the fall of 2009, the realization that fraud and abuse within the SDVOSB program began heating up. The House Small Business Committee (SBC), dupedchaired then by Ms. Nadia Velazquez (D-NY), requested that GAO investigate the SDVOSB set-aside program for fraud and abuse. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) began digging deeper.

[Read more]  http://vetlikeme.org/brief-history-of-fraud-and-abuse-in-the-sdvosb-set-aside-program/

 That Ain’t Roses: SDVOSB Fraud Stinks Up Garden State

 by Sarah SchauerteSarah Schauerte

On January 22, a New Jersey construction firm, Veteran Construction, reached a $1.3 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) in order to settle claims that it misrepresented itself as a service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) by using a veteran “nominee” for SDVOSB status. From 2008 through 2011, Veteran Construction used this status to receive over $6.5 million in set-aside contracts from the VA.

 

 

[Read more]  http://vetlikeme.org/that-aint-roses-sdvosb-fraud-stinks-up-garden-state/

 

Dispatches to the Veterans Administration

lawyers Office of the General Counsel

U.S. General Accounting Office

441 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20548

Re: GAO Case file # B-410936

Dear Ms Owen:

Crosstown Courier Service is responding to the VA letter dated 16 January 2015   received 16 January 2015(Friday) requesting dismissal of referenced protest on the basis that the VA Contracting Officer did in fact properly conduct market research that determined there was no reasonable expectation of receiving offers from two or more eligible SDVOSB firms were capable of performing the required work at a fair and reasonable price. As such the Contracting Officer did not set aside the requirement for SDVOSBs. It goes on to say “This is matter of informed business judgement within the Contracting Officer discretion and GAO should refrain from disturbing it”.

[Read more]  http://vetlikeme.org/dispatches-to-the-veterans-administration-4/

Criminal probe focuses on fraud in construction program aimed at helping disabled veterans

by David Wren _ 140903-Fraud-1024x682 Jan 22 2015

Federal criminal investigators are looking into whether North Charleston-based Brantley Construction Co. defrauded the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs out of more than $17.5 million by setting up a sham corporation to qualify for special contracts earmarked for businesses owned by disabled veterans. Among the contracts Brantley Construction obtained, according to court documents, was the $10.2 million construction of the Fort Jackson National Cemetery in Columbia. The remaining money was spread across six other projects. The criminal investigation was revealed in a court filing this month by lawyers representing Brantley Construction in a separate whistleblower lawsuit over the allegations.

 

[Read more]  http://vetlikeme.org/criminal-probe-focuses-on-fraud-in-construction-program-aimed-at-helping-disabled-veterans/

Award Improper Because VA Admitted It Could Not Afford Optional Work

John Manfredonia Attorney at Manfredonia Law Offices, LLCGM_Logo

In Glen Mar Construction, Inc., B-410603 (January 14, 2015), the GAO sustained a bid protest challenging the VA’s

evaluation of pricing in a solicitation for construction of a primary care building at the VA Medical Center in Vancouver, Washington. The solicitation

was based on FAR Part 14, with award to the lowest priced offer. Bidders were required to provide pricing for the base construction project and nine…..

[Read more]  http://vetlikeme.org/award-improper-because-va-admitted-it-could-not-afford-optional-work-tuesday-draft/

VLM logo1 - Copy

VLM Weekly Stone 1/30/2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
Previous articleU.S. economy cools in fourth quarter, but consumer spending shines
Next articleHow to Write Impressive Essays
Hardy Stone is the editor/publisher of VetLikeMe, the nation's only publication devoted to service disabled veteran owned business.