Revolutionary Activities, the CIA, and Drug Trafficking

“In country after country, from Mexico and Honduras to Panama and Peru, the CIA helped set up or consolidate intelligence agencies that became forces of repression, and whose intelligence connections to other countries greased the way for illicit drug shipments.”—Peter Dale Scott of the University of California[1]

 

         …by Jonas E. Alexis

 

In two previous articles, I have stated plainly and unambiguously that I am not quarrelling with the word “multiculturalism” itself. After all, this is a “multiculturalist” world. All you have to do is travel around and meet some of the nicest people around the globe.
Moreover, I do not take issues with people. As Winston Churchill rightly put it, people can be “good, bad and, for the most part, indifferent.”[2] We are not fighting against people—we are fighting against an ideology. We are also naming names here because ideologies cannot exist on their own.
We have also made clear that “multiculturalism” is not the idea that people ought to be cherished for who they are. “Multiculturalism” in the West in particular is the idea that Western culture is racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynistic, etc.
Since it is an attack on the West in general, it was inevitable that Jewish revolutionaries would end up supporting that movement in order to fight what they perceive to be as anti-Semitic. We also saw that Barbara Lerner Spectre made it clear that she wanted to use “multiculturalism” to destroy the social cohesion of Sweden because Sweden, to Spectre, is anti-Semitic.[3]
Yet while Spectre is working hard to destroy Sweden, Joe Klein of Time magazine is happy that the social and cultural dynamic in America is changing (largely due to illegal immigrants). The title of his article is quite stunning: “Trayvon’s Death Is an Outrage, But…Thanks to Immigration, Stronger Laws and Years of Hard Work, our Poisonous Biracial Era is Ending.”[4]
What Klein did not mention in his article is that the people who were working hard to change the immigration policy in the United States were Jewish revolutionaries and organizations.
It was inevitable that people like Klein would use the Martin-Zimmerman case as a vehicle for political and social insurrections, just like they did during the Civil Rights movement, an issue we shall examine hopefully in late fall.
In a similar vein, Abe Foxman of the ADL declared that Obama “was right” to get involved in the Martin-Zimmerman case because the United States is “a racist society”[5] and is largely responsible for anti-Semitism and bigotry.
As it turned out, the Martin-Zimmerman case was like a gravitational force which set fire in the imagination of Jewish revolutionaries for cultural insurrections. Klein seems to be very happy about these.[6]
Moreover, instead of dealing with serious issues facing the world, Klein’s Time Magazine celebrates the joy of not having children. This issue indirectly goes all the way back to Jewish sociologist and Stalin admirer Louis Wirth (1897-1952).[7]
Here is Klein at his best:
“George Zimmerman clearly was guilty of overzealous racial profiling, but there was no definitive evidence of how the scuffle began.”[8]
How can you seriously say someone was guilty of “overzealous racial profiling” when there was “no definitive evidence of how the scuffle began”? Well, in the Jewish Century, it is all right to propound nonsense in order to incite social and ethnic insurrections, most particularly when those insurrections are congruent with Jewish revolutionary activity.
Moreover, Klein does not want to ask the bigger questions and do further research because that would literally ruin his Jewish interpretation of the Martin-Zimmerman case.
For example, in 2000, two black relatives by the name of Reginald and Jonathan Carr, ages 22 and 20, respectively, ended up killing five whites. This was later known as The Wichita Massacre or The Wichita Horror. Wikipedia itself acknowledges,
“Carrs forced their hostages to strip naked, bound and detained them, and subjected them to various forms of sexual humiliation, including rape and oral sex. They also forced the men to engage in sexual acts with the women, and the women with each other.
“They then drove the victims to ATMs to empty their bank accounts, before finally taking them to a snowy deserted soccer complex on the outskirts of town and shooting them execution-style in the backs of their heads, leaving them for dead.
 “The Carr brothers then drove Befort’s truck over the bodies. They returned to the house to ransack it for more valuables, and in the process killed Nikki, H.G.’s muzzled dog. H.G. survived because her metal barrette deflected the bullet, and ran naked for more than a mile in freezing weather to report the attack and seek medical attention.”[9]
Now listen to Wikipedia again: “Since there was reportedly no prima facie evidence of racial motivation, only that the victims were white and the Carr brothers are black, Sedgwick County District Attorney Nola Foulston decided not to treat the incident as a hate crime”![10] It’s not a crime because it was committed by blacks, but Zimmerman was guilty because he was acting in self-defense.

With respect to the incident, Thomas Sowell declared that the media tend to play down “vicious crimes by blacks against whites” and play up “vicious crimes by whites against blacks.”[11]
Sowell is right, but he needs to go beyond stage one and tells us that it is people like Klein who control the media. This is one of the problems I have with people like Sowell: they do not probe deeper questions largely because that would get them into trouble. Philosopher and metaphysician Peter Ludlow of Northwestern University is a classic example. He brilliantly argued that
“The realm of secrecy and deception among shadowy yet powerful forces [namely the NSA] may sound like the province of investigative reporters, thriller novelists and Hollywood moviemakers — and it is — but it is also a matter for philosophers. More accurately, understanding deception and how it can be exposed has been a principle project of philosophy for the last 2500 years. And it is a place where the work of journalists, philosophers and other truth-seekers can meet.
“In one of the most referenced allegories in the Western intellectual tradition, Plato describes a group of individuals shackled inside a cave with a fire behind them. They are able to see only shadows cast upon a wall by the people walking behind them. They mistake shadows for reality. To see things as they truly are, they need to be unshackled and make their way outside the cave. Reporting on the world as it truly is outside the cave is one of the foundational duties of philosophers….
“The Greek word deployed by Plato in ‘The Cave’ — aletheia — is typically translated as truth, but is more aptly translated as ‘disclosure’ or ‘uncovering’ —   literally, ‘the state of not being hidden.’   Martin Heidegger, in an essay on the allegory of the cave, suggested that the process of uncovering was actually a precondition for having truth.  It would then follow that the goal of the truth-seeker is to help people in this disclosure — it is to defeat the illusory representations that prevent us from seeing the world the way it is.  There is no propositional truth to be had until this first task is complete.
“This is the key to understanding why hackers like Jeremy Hammond are held in such high regard by their supporters.  They aren’t just fellow activists or fellow hackers — they are defending us from epistemic attack.  Their actions help lift the hood that is periodically pulled over our eyes to blind us from the truth.”[12]
I agree completely with Ludlow here, but will Ludlow use that principle to examine the deep forces that are manipulating the media, the NSA, the banks, perpetual wars in the Middle East, etc., in order “to see things as they truly are”? While the scholarly documentation of the forces at work here is widely accessible, I doubt that Ludlow will move beyond stage one, particularly if he discovers that the NSA is ideologically and largely an Israeli town. His job as a columnist for the New York Times and as a philosophy professor would all be over. He would be shoveling snow in academic Siberia.
Eight years prior to The Wichita Massacre, Ambrose Harris, 43, kidnapped, raped, and murdered Kristin Huggins in Lower Makefield Township, Pennsylvania. Huggins, 22, was an artist. During the trial, Harris called the court staff and others “racist to the core.”[13] The New York Times did not report this until 1996, when “the case got so much local publicity”! Klein did not write a report on The Wichita Horror in Time magazine.
There is another issue that Klein fails to grasp. Robert Stacy McCain declared in the American Spectator:
“The February 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martion might never have happened if school officials in Miami-Dade County had not instituted an unofficial policy of treating crimes as school disciplinary infractions.
“Revelations that emerged from an internal affairs investigation explain why Martin was not arrested when caught at school with stolen jewelry in October 2011 or with marijuana in February 2012. Instead, the teenager was suspended from school, the last time just days before he was shot dead by George Zimmerman.
“Trayvon Martin was not from Sanford, the town north of Orlando where he was shot in 2012 and where a jury acquitted Zimmerman of murder charges Saturday. Martin was from Miami Gardens, more than 200 miles away, and had come to Sanford to stay with his father’s girlfriend Brandy Green at her home in the townhouse community where Zimmerman was in charge of the neighborhood watch.
“Trayvon was staying with Green after he had been suspended for the second time in six months from Krop High School in Miami-Dade County, where both his father, Tracy Martin, and mother, Sybrina Fulton, lived.
“Both of Trayvon’s suspensions during his junior year at Krop High involved crimes that could have led to his prosecution as a juvenile offender. However, Chief Charles Hurley of the Miami-Dade School Police Department (MDSPD) in 2010 had implemented a policy that reduced the number of criiminal reports, manipulating statistics to create the appearance of a reduction in crime within the school system.
“Less than two weeks before Martin’s death, the school system commended Chief Hurley for “decreasing school-related juvenile delinquency by an impressive 60 percent for the last six months of 2011.” What was actually happening was that crimes were not being reported as crimes, but instead treated as disciplinary infractions.
“In October 2011, after a video surveillance camera caught Martin writing graffiti on a door, MDSPD Office Darryl Dunn searched Martin’s backpack, looking for the marker he had used. Officer Dunn found 12 pieces of women’s jewelry and a man’s watch, along with a flathead screwdriver the officer described as a ‘burglary tool.’
“The jewelry and watch, which Martin claimed he had gotten from a friend he refused to name, matched a description of items stolen during the October 2011 burglary of a house on 204th Terrace, about a half-mile from the school.
“However, because of Chief Hurley’s policy ‘to lower the arrest rates,’ as one MDSPD sergeant said in an internal investigation, the stolen jewerly was instead listed as ‘found property’ and was never reported to Miami-Dade Police who were investigating the burglary.
“Similarly, in February 2012 when an MDSPD officer caught Martin with a small plastic bag containing marijuana residue, as well as a marijuana pipe, this was not treated as a crime, and instead Martin was suspended from school.
“Either of those incidents could have put Trayvon Martin into the custody of the juvenile justice system. However, because of Chief Hurley’s attempt to reduce the school crime statistics — according to sworn testimony, officers were “basically told to lie and falsify” reports — Martin was never arrested. And if he had been arrested, he might never have been in Sanford the night of his fatal encounter with Zimmerman.”[14]

Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s thesis
One of the people who discovered that Jewish revolutionaries were using Blacks as “remote control” was the late Harold Cruse, a professor at the University of Michigan. A Communist, Cruse quickly realized that Jewish revolutionaries were the avant-garde of political and social upheavals and were placing Blacks into revolutionary cells.
Right after the Civil Rights movement in 1967, Cruse’s The Crisis of Negro Intellectual and Plural but Equal eventually broke the black-Jewish alliance which had previously been in existence since 1909 during the founding of the NAACP.[15] Cruse got some of his information from the noted Russian writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky, who wrote way back in 1877 in his Diary of a Writer:
“But let them be morally purer than all the peoples of the world, nevertheless I have just read in the March issue of the Messenger of Europe as news item to the effect that in America, in the Southern States, they [the Jews] have already leaped en mass upon the millions of liberated Negroes and have already taken a grip upon them in their, the Jews’ own way, by means of their semppiternal ‘gold pursuit’ and by taking advantage of the inexperience and vices of the exploited tribe…
“the Negroes have now been liberated from the slave owners, but that will not last because Jews, of whom there are so many in the world, will jump at this new little victim.”[16]
Lord Peter Benjamin Mandelson and “Multiculturalism” in England

British Labour Party politician Lord Peter Benjamin Mandelson, a Jewish revolutionary who served under Tony Blair, has used “multiculturalism” to inflict pain upon much of England.
As a revolutionary, Mandelson was a member of the Young Communist League in his teenage years.[17] As a student at Oxford, he joined the National Association of Labour Student Organizations (NALSO), which was divided into two main groups: Trotskyism and a mainstream group called Clause Four.[18] What has Mandelson produced over the years? Listen to the Daily Mail:
“Labour sent out ‘search parties’ for immigrants to get them to come to the UK, Lord Mandelson has admitted.
“In a stunning confirmation that the Blair and Brown governments deliberately engineered mass immigration, the former Cabinet Minister and spin doctor said New Labour sought out foreign workers.
“He also conceded that the influx of arrivals meant the party’s traditional supporters are now unable to find work….Between 1997 and 2010, net migration to Britain totalled more than 2.2million, more than twice the population of Birmingham.
“The annual net figure quadrupled under Labour from 48,000 people in 1997 to 198,000 by 2009.
“Lord Mandelson’s remarks come three years after Labour officials denied claims by former adviser Andrew Neather that they deliberately encouraged immigration in order to change the make-up of Britain.
“Mr Neather said the policy was designed to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity’. He said there was ‘a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural
“Senior Labour figures have been reluctant to concede they deliberately engineered the influx of migrants who have transformed communities over the past decade.
“But, at a rally for the Blairite think-tank Progress, Lord Mandelson said: ‘In 2004 when as a Labour government, we were not only welcoming people to come into this country to work, we were sending out search parties for people and encouraging them, in some cases, to take up work in this country.”[19]
Mandelson made this stunning statement:
“When Labour encouraged new arrivals ‘we were almost … a full employment economy’ but, he admitted: ‘The situation is different obviously now.
“‘We have to just realise… entry to the labour market of many people of non-British origin is hard for people who are finding it very difficult to find jobs, who find it hard to keep jobs.
‘For these people immigration tends to loom large in their lives and in their worlds, now that is an inescapable fact, and we have to understand it, address it, engage with people in discussion about it.’”[20]
Mandelson is destroying the cultural fabric of England, Barbara Lerner Spectre is destabilizing the social structure of Sweden, and Jewish revolutionaries and organizations are doing the same thing in the United States.[21]
E. Michael Jones was right in 2011 when he declared that “multiculturalism has been a completely Jewish creation from start to finish. For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power.”[22]

Rabbi Rob Nosanchuk, the CIA, and Drug Trafficking
In an article entitled “Rabbis Organizing Rabbis—Action for Immigration Reform in Ohio,” Senior Rabbi of Anshe Chesed Fairmount Temple Rob Nosanchuk wrote,
“We recognize the gravity of this particular moment in the U.S. Senate. We approach you to ask that you stand in alliance with the coalition meeting with you today, in advocating strongly for a just solution to the broken U.S. immigration system. As Jews, our heritage is one of lifting up values of justice and compassion…
“There’s no fairness offered to the millions of undocumented immigrants who, because we have failed in the past to make a difference in the public square on this issue, have been living in the illegalities of society.
“There’s no goodness in the offing for the 5,000 children of immigrants forced into the foster care system.
“There’s no equality in the system for LGBT Americans who are deemed illegitimate to protect a spouse or partner the way others can.”[23]
A few things must be noted here. First of all, illegal immigration leads to all sorts of detrimental consequences, too much to detail here. Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that illegal immigration will cost the average American $6.3 trillion over the next fifty years![24]
Dinan also reports that “3 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S. at least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as high as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent immigrants.”[25]
Once the government gives the go-ahead to illegal immigration, crimes such as drug trafficking between Mexico and the United States will get an easy passport. As we shall see in a moment, this covert activity has largely been the CIA’s modus operandi.
“Fourteen dismembered bodies were found in a truck in the center of a town in northern Mexico on Thursday in what appeared to be the latest atrocity committed by rival gangs battling over drug-smuggling routes, local media said. The bodies of 11 men and three women were discovered in the sugar-cane farming town of Ciudad Mante in the south of Tamaulipas state, which borders on Texas.”[26]

Former president of Mexico, Felipe Calderon, was heavily involved in drug trafficking and other criminal activities. The New York Times acknowledged, “President Felipe Calderón’s own drug czar, Noe Ramirez, was charged with accepting $450,000 each month.”[27]
Calderon, of course, could not have accomplished such a feat without the support from the CIA. Peter Dale Scott of the University of California argues in his meticulous study Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America that drug trafficking and other related crimes were made possible through the CIA. Scott and his co-author write:
“In country after country, from Mexico and Honduras to Panama and Peru, the CIA helped set up or consolidate intelligence agencies that became forces of repression, and whose intelligence connections to other countries greased the way for illicit drug shipments. Although each of these cases is now public and has received scattered coverage in mainstream media, journalists (and politicians) remaind reluctant to squarely address the recurring CIA-drug problem…
“Today the United States, in the name of fighting drugs, has entered into alliances with the police, armed forces, and intelligence agencies of Colombia and Peru, forces conspicuous by their own alliances with drug traffickers in counterinsurgency operations.
“One of the most glaring and dangerous examples is in Peru. Behind Peru’s president, Alberto Fujimori, is his chief adviser Vladimiro Montesinos, the effective head of the National Intelligence Service, or SIN, an agency created and trained by the CIA in the 1960s…
“Washington’s proclivity to tolerate, protect, and reinforce the influence of Third World drug traffickers didn’t die with the end of the Reagan-Bush years. Indeed, the Clinton Administration, guided by White House drug czar General Barry McCaffrey, has consistently asked for large increases in counternarcotics aid to compromise Latin American police and military forces.”[28]
Over all, Scott’s study historically detailed the criminal activity of the C.I.A. over the past two decades. There was also a Jewish revolutionary cell operating for the C.I.A. as well. Jewish feminists such as Gloria Steinman were CIA agents, and the CIA used to support former trotskyite magazines such as Partisan Review and The New Leader.[29] People like Victor Reuther, Allard Lowenstein, Bayard Rustin, among others, were all secret agents of the C.I.A.[30]
Gangs and Illegal Immigration
Kevin Johnson of USA Today reports:

“Criminal gangs in the USA have swelled to an estimated 1 million members responsible for up to 80% of crimes in communities across the nation, according to a gang threat assessment compiled by federal officials. The major findings in a report by the Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence Center, which has not been publicly released, conclude gangs are the ‘primary retail-level distributors of most illicit drugs’ and several are ‘capable’ of competing with major U.S.-based Mexican drug-trafficking organizations.”[31]
In other words, when Jewish organizations made the case for illegal immigration, they were indirectly and subtly attacking virtually all Americans. After they have made illegal immigration possible, the University of Southern California has found out that “In some parts of Koreatown and South Los Angeles, one in three adult residents is in the country illegally… In Los Angeles County, one in five children has a parent living in the country illegally.”[32]
Many of those Americans simply have no clue of what is actually taking place, particularly when Zionist puppets like John McCain keep saying things like “We don’t need 20,000 additional border patrol agents.”[33] What is even more interesting is that the Obama administration has already sued the state of Arizona for trying to enforce the law with respect to illegal immigration.[34]
Moreover, where was rabbi Rob Nosanchuk when Israel was sending illegal workers back to their home?[35] Shimon Gapso, an Israeli mayor, declared:
“Yes — I’m not afraid to say it out loud, to write it and add my signature, or declare it in front of the cameras: Upper Nazareth is a Jewish city and it’s important that it remains so. If that makes me a racist, then I’m a proud offshoot of a glorious dynasty of “racists” that started with the “Covenant of the Pieces…”[36]
Benjamin Netanyahu said last year, “Our aim is to repatriate tens of thousands of infiltrators now in Israel to their countries of origin. After having been confronted by the threat of hundreds of thousands, this month [December] not a single infiltrator has reached cities in Israel.”[37]
Interior Minister Eli Yishai during the Operation Pillar of Defense:
“The goal of the operation is to send Gaza back to the Middle Ages. Only then will Israel be calm for forty years.”[38]
As far as I know, not a single Jewish organization or rabbi in the United States has challenged Gapso or Netanyahu or Yishai on this. But now Nosanchuk wants to talk about “lifting up values of justice and compassion…”!
The (Neo-Bolshevik) Ethnic Cleansing of Decent Americans
Probably no one was able to formulate the “multicultural” ideology more vividly than Jewish sociologist Earl Raab back in 1995. He said:
“An increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop.  … The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
“We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible—and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”[39]
Raab’s prediction is working. By 2013, Chris Stirewalt of Fox News declared,
“The federal government is getting serious about pushing racial and ethnic diversity into America’s neighborhoods–and is using big data and big money to achieve its aims. A new interactive database will help regulators, local housing officials and individuals take action on a newly proposed regulation that would require agencies to ‘affirmatively further’ the inclusion of minority residents in white neighborhoods.
“Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan announced the database and regulation at last week’s NAACP convention, saying the Obama administration was battling ‘a quieter form of discrimination’ that was ‘just as harmful’ as long-outlawed segregationist practices, like racially restrictive property covenants….
“The goal here then is to continue to prosecute at a high rate incidences deemed proactively segregationist – Donovan touted 25,000 individuals in the past 3 years being paid damages under cases reported to the agency or independently investigated by HUD – but to add in a mandate for diversifying neighborhoods. The old way was to punish exclusion. The new way is to punish lack of inclusion.
“The punishment is also different. Rather than fines and prosecutions for those who sought to keep minorities out, the new penalty would be a withholding of federal funds from local and state government agencies dependent on HUD grants if they fail to push greater diversity. The way those agencies interact with developers, realtors, homeowners associations and others would need to reflect the federal push for diversity.
“The report card comes in the form of the new maps, which use Census data to score communities on their racial and ethnic concentrations, as well as income and community services. Check out the Atlanta suburbs. South of Dekalb Avenue, the dots are mostly green – black residents – and north of Dekalb Avenue, the dots are mostly blue – white residents.
“HUD wants a more even distribution of blue and green dots in the city and if you are planning a new subdivision or a realtor looking to sign potential buyers up for FHA loans, the dot distribution is something the Obama administration wants you to be mindful of. And your local zoning board, county commission or state real estate licensing bureau ought to be mindful too, since their funding could depend on it.”[40]
The government is forcing people to live in places that they may or may not like in the name of “diversity.” You may be sure that the same government will get involved in other covert activities as well in order to destroy those neighborhoods. In fact, the FBI alone “gave its informants permission to break the law at least 5,658 times in a single year, according to newly disclosed documents that show just how often the nation’s top law enforcement agency enlists criminals to help it battle crime.”[41] The report continued,
“Agents authorized 15 crimes a day, on average, including everything from buying and selling illegal drugs to bribing government officials and plotting robberies. FBI officials have said in the past that permitting their informants — who are often criminals themselves — to break the law is an indispensable, if sometimes distasteful, part of investigating criminal organizations.”[42]
What does that tell us? It means that whenever the neo-Bolshevik/neoconservative/Zionist/diabolical ideology takes place, it will slowly but surely seek to find or create subversive activity in order to destroy any country, any society, and any civilization. Whether you like it or not, they will do it in front of your eyes. The evolution of the NSA is a classic example.
Even after it became common knowledge that the Israeli-run NSA has violated basic human rights and freedom and the Constitution, even after they have heard all the complaints about their evil acts, they still want to spy on virtually every single American. Evidence and whistleblowers to them were like a red rag to a bull. Obama was even trying to persuade the American people to be “comfortable” about the NSA.[43] Mr. President declared, “We have to strike the right balance between protecting our security and preserving our freedoms.”[44]
In other words, snooping on virtually every American is a “right balance”; snooping on virtually every country around the world is compatible with “protecting our security and preserving our freedoms.” Once again Obama continues to summon lies in order to lull the American people into a false sense of security:
“To others around the world, I want to make clear once again that America is not interested in spying on ordinary people. Our intelligence is focused above all on finding the information that’s necessary to protect our people and, in many cases, protect our allies. It’s true we have significant capabilities. What’s also true is we show a restraint that many governments around the world don’t even think to do.”[45]
Richard Nixon once said that “Publicly, we [politicians] say one thing. Actually, we do another.”[46] Obama is a classic example of that. Listen to the president very carefully here:
“I am comfortable that the program currently is not being abused. I am comfortable that if the American people examined exactly what was taking place, how it was being used, what the safeguards were, that they would say, ‘You know what? These folks are following the law.’”[47]
What Obama did not tell the American people is that the NSA is following the Israeli law, not the American law which the Founding Fathers set forth in the Constitution. Obama invoked the Constitution to make his point, saying that spying will continue to take place:
“This is how we’re going to resolve our differences in the United States through vigorous public debate guided by our Constitution, with reverence for our history as a nation of laws, and with respect for the facts.”[48]
But Obama did not bother to tell us what the Fourth Amendment actually says because that would ruin his Zionist propaganda.
Recently, the Guardian just released a document saying that Section 702 of the Fisa Amendment Act (FAA) gives the NSA full authority to target U.S. citizens and foreigners without warrant.[49] The New York Times has said the same thing.[50]
Obama denounced Edward Snowden as unpatriotic,[51] but Obama, in his subterranean mind, knows very well that it is the NSA that is unpatriotic.
So, we have surveillance in the entire world, perpetual wars in the Middle East; we have America dropping drones in numerous places, killing men, women and children.[52] And that, to the neo-Bolsheviks, is freedom in its existential sense. A few days ago, the BBC reported,
“In a safe house with guards stationed outside, Mohammed Ahmad Bagash, a mechanic from the nearby town of Jaar, tells me his story. During the fighting, al Qaeda fighters stored ammunition in the local hospital against the wishes of the doctors.
“After the hospital was hit by a missile strike, Mohammed and his two children ran to a school and hid in the basement. But then the school was hit in a suspected drone strike.
“‘It was as if everyone was burning. It was all dark,’ said Mr Bagash. ‘When the smoke cleared, I saw my son’s leg was bleeding, and my daughter was hit on the back of the head,’ he said. He carried both children out. His son survived but his eight-year-old daughter bled to death on the way to the hospital. ‘As she bled, she went yellow. She actually started to shrink in my arms,’ he said. Several other children were injured in the attack.
Bagash seems to realize that no American would tolerate that type of behavior. In response, he said, “What did my daughter ever do to them? She was only eight years old. They think we’re rats.”[53] Another individual lamented that the drones “are killing our people, killing our children and destroying our homes. The drones don’t differentiate between people. They kill people.”[54]
Signing Pacts with Terrorists
Virtually every week, the neo-Bolshevik/Zionist would come up with something “fresh” and astounding. We have already seen in previous articles how the U.S. ideologically signed pacts with terrorist affiliates. In order to boost the NSA spying on Americans, the Obama administration sounded the alarm that Al-Qaeda sought to attack America.
How did they discover this “truth”? Well, through the NSA. How else? Now Obama has a new message for America. As Mark Mazzetti and Scott Shane of the New York Times put it, “the expansive monitoring of telephone and electronic communications would continue because the safety of the country depended on it.”[55]
The safety of the country depended on it? By protecting us from Al-Qaeda? As Jewish philosopher, historian and political scientist Avner Cohen put it some years ago, “Hamas, to my regret, is Israel’s creation.”[56]
In other words, Hamas is good for Israel. If that is the case, what does that tell us about “terrorism” in the Middle East?